>Advice on: sooner, faster, smaller, thriftier
Please advise us of other “helpful hints” that should go here!
By using them, you are telling GHC that you are willing to suffer longer compilation times for better-quality code.
GHC is surprisingly zippy for normal compilations without -O!
Within reason, more memory for heap space means less garbage collection for GHC, which means less compilation time. If you use the -Rghc-timing option, you'll get a garbage-collector report. (Again, you can use the cheap-and-nasty +RTS -Sstderr -RTS option to send the GC stats straight to standard error.)
If it says you're using more than 20% of total time in garbage collecting, then more memory would help.
If the heap size is approaching the maximum (64M by default), and you have lots of memory, try increasing the maximum with the -M<size> option, e.g.: ghc -c -O -M1024m Foo.hs.
Increasing the default allocation area size used by the compiler's RTS might also help: use the -A<size> option.
If GHC persists in being a bad memory citizen, please report it as a bug.
As soon as GHC plus its “fellow citizens” (other processes on your machine) start using more than the real memory on your machine, and the machine starts “thrashing,” the party is over. Compile times will be worse than terrible! Use something like the csh-builtin time command to get a report on how many page faults you're getting.
If you don't know what virtual memory, thrashing, and page faults are, or you don't know the memory configuration of your machine, don't try to be clever about memory use: you'll just make your life a misery (and for other people, too, probably).
Because Haskell objects and libraries tend to be large, it can take many real seconds to slurp the bits to/from a remote filesystem.
It would be quite sensible to compile on a fast machine using remotely-mounted disks; then link on a slow machine that had your disks directly mounted.
It's ugly and slow.
Deeply-nested list comprehensions seem to be one such; in the past, very large constant tables were bad, too.
We'd rather you reported such behaviour as a bug, so that we can try to correct it.
The part of the compiler that is occasionally prone to wandering off for a long time is the strictness analyser. You can turn this off individually with -fno-strictness.
To figure out which part of the compiler is badly behaved, the -v2 option is your friend.
If your module has big wads of constant data, GHC may produce a huge basic block that will cause the native-code generator's register allocator to founder. Bring on -fvia-C (not that GCC will be that quick about it, either).
Instead of saying import Foo, say import Foo (...stuff I want...) You can get GHC to tell you the minimal set of required imports by using the -ddump-minimal-imports option (see Section 4.9.4).
Truthfully, the reduction on compilation time will be very small. However, judicious use of import declarations can make a program easier to understand, so it may be a good idea anyway.